Appetite, Etiquette, and the Teenage Tummy

Young husband eating tasteless food at home for lunch

In the realm of familial hospitality, a culinary clash sparks debate – a 27-year-old host, a ravenous teenage nephew, and the age-old question of when to say ‘enough’.

This is a tale that delves into the realms of growing appetites, family dynamics, and the complexities of hosting a hearty gathering.

Feasting on the Dilemma

Meet the original poster (OP), a 27-year-old man embracing the role of the gracious host to his three nephews.

As the get together kicks off, an array of energetic youngsters arrive for a weekend of bonding and fun. Among this lively group, Erik, OP’s 14-year-old nephew, takes center stage.

The weekend’s festivities unfold with hearty dinners, and it is during one such meal that the epicenter of this tale is set.

Meatloaf and mac and cheese grace the table, and as plates are served, it becomes evident that Erik possesses an insatiable hunger. Despite his lanky frame, his appetite knows no bounds, a familiar echo of OP’s own teenage years.

In the midst of the feast, a dilemma emerges – Erik yearns for more, desiring an encore of dinner after savoring dessert. OP, being mindful of ensuring enough food for the weekend, denies this request.

However, what follows is a twist that sets the stage for a culinary debate.

An Appetite at Odds

The plot thickens as OP’s wife steps in, defying his decision and permitting Erik to indulge in his hunger.

What ensues is a culinary marathon as Erik devours serving after serving, eventually succumbing to his food-induced fatigue on the couch, amidst the video game sessions of his cousins.

This decision of OP’s wife becomes a point of contention that lingers in the backdrop of their otherwise enjoyable day. As the day draws to a close, OP and his wife retire to their bed, yet the lingering question hangs heavy in the air – was he wrong?

The wife thinks Erik could eat as much as he wanted since he’s a guest and found it strange that OP denied Eric without talking to her about it. She is also of the opinion that they can always re-stock the kitchen in the morning.

OP is unconvinced, thinking Erik had enough to eat already, but reaches out to social media to gain some external perspectives.

The Digital Jury Speaks

Odd-Mess1511 serves as the resounding overture, emphasizing the basic premise of a growing teenage boy’s hunger.

With a nod to Erik’s preference for more meatloaf rather than sweets, this commentator underscores that his request for seconds is a testament to his genuine hunger.

“It’d be one thing if he just wanted sweets. He wanted more meatloaf, he’s clearly still hungry.”

Affectionate_Shoe198 takes the stage, applauding Erik’s respect for dining etiquette and setting boundaries.

This perspective underscores how setting limits is a crucial aspect of nurturing, echoing the main adult’s role in responding appropriately to a child’s over-indulgence.

The sentiment that teenagers’ hunger knows no bounds is echoed by Coco_Celine_Chloe.

This voice of reason questions whether OP remembers the insatiable hunger of their own teenage years. The dynamics of Erik’s lifestyle, including sports and activity, are likely the contributing factors to his ravenous appetite.

A distinctive voice enters the discussion as Mammoth-Ad3788 highlights the significance of these moments of nourishment.

“We don’t have to control how much someone is hungry.”

And then, meetmypuka lends a lighthearted note to the dialogue. With a dash of humor, they poke fun at the reason OP wants to keep his nephew hungry – to save leftovers for the next day. The user doesn’t think saving food is a good enough reason to keep someone hungry. .

The Verdict

The consensus among commenters is clear: Erik’s hunger as a growing teenage boy should have been accommodated. Many emphasize that his request for more food was reasonable, given his age and physical needs.

The overarching sentiment is that OP, in denying him seconds, missed an opportunity for empathy and understanding. Erik’s appetite should have been respected, and his comfort and satisfaction should have been prioritized during his stay.

The story serves as a reminder that catering to guests’ appetite is not merely about filling a stomach, but embracing the warmth of shared moments.

What do you think? Let us know in the comments. Do you think the OP from this social media post was wrong?

Featured Image Credit: Elnur_ /

This article was originally published on Ash & Pri.

Like our content? Be sure to follow us.

DISCLOSURE: The post may contain affiliate links, which means that I may receive a small commission if you make a purchase using these links. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. You can read our affiliate disclosure in our privacy policy. This site is not intending to provide financial advice. This is for entertainment only.

Pri Kingston

Ash & Pri are the Founders of and have spent the last decade building their way towards financial freedom and a lifetime of memories. Having successfully achieved their early retirement goal in under 10 years, they look forward to sharing their financial sense with like-minded people. Read more about Ash & Pri in the 'About Us' section.